Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Hyde

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1921No. 10159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by Emma Hyde Stoner and others against George L. Hyde, individually, and George L. Hyde as administrator of the estate of Rolandis H. Hyde, deceased, to enjoin the administrator from procuring orders in the county court of Garfield county to sell certain lands belonging to the estate of Rolandis H. Hyde, deceased. Judgment denying the injunction and dismissing the action, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This was an action brought in the district court of Garfield county by Emma Hyde Stoner et al. against George L. Hyde, individually, and against George L. Hyde, administrator of the estate of Rolandis H. Hyde, deceased, to enjoin the said George L. Hyde as administrator from procuring orders in the county court of Garfield county to sell certain lands belonging to the estate of Rolandis H. Hyde, deceased, and from making such sales.

The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action for the reason that the court had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the same; that the jurisdiction of said…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weaver v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Ward v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Swain v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Worley v. MundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Home Appliance Store v. Anderson Hotels of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API