Schweigel v. L. A. Shakman Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Big Stone county to determine adverse claims to land. The case was tried before C. L. Brown, J., who found that plaintiff was owner of the land subject to the rights of defendant under an execution sale in an undivided one-half of the land. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
CANTY, J.1
On January 13, 1897, plaintiff was the owner of 160 acres of land in Big Stone county. On that day she conveyed it, and several other tracts of land in Minnesota, and in Grant county, South Dakota, to her son, and the deed was duly recorded. Thereupon the son made to his father a deed of the undivided one-half of the 160 acres and of the whole of certain parcels of the Dakota land. This deed is dated January 13,2 1897, and was recorded in North Dakota on September 27, 1897, but has never been recorded in Minnesota. The son made another deed, by the terms of which he conveyed back to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by3 opinions
- Charles Mix County Bank v. CaltaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Golden Valley County v. CurtinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Ingebretson v. MontagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939