Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. Survant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1927No. 18424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an, appeal from the judgment of the common pleas court of Tulsa county, wherein the plaintiff in error was plaintiff below.

The plaintiff in error in due time served and filed its brief in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or otherwise appear in this court on appeal, nor has he offered any excuse for his failure to do so.

“Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. CoatneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Wolfe v. State Ex Rel. PressonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Morrison v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 6Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Nowata Oil Syndicate v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API