Legal Opinion

In re Taijha H.-B.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 27, 2019No. SC20151PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

October 8, 2019 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3

333 Conn. 297

OCTOBER, 2019 297 In re Taijha H.-B. IN RE TAIJHA H.-B.* (SC 20151) Palmer, McDonald, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Anders v. Califor- nia ( 386 U.S. 738), appointed appellate counsel for an indigent defendant who concludes that the grounds for the defendant’s appeal are wholly frivolous and wishes to withdraw from representation must, prior to withdrawal, provide the court and the defendant with a brief outlining anything in the record that may support the appeal, and…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API