Legal Opinion

McCusker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1992No. 385 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

Alan L. McCusker (Claimant), widower of Marilyn McCusker (Decedent), petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed a referee’s decision granting Rushton Mining Company’s (Employer) petition for termination of benefits after determining that Claimant had engaged in a meretricious relationship in violation of Section 307(7) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act). 1

The issues presented for our review are whether Claimant’s sexual conduct with an unmarried woman constitutes a meretricious relationship under Section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. DeJesus v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Nevius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. BethEnergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCusker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Shultz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. McCusker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. McCusker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API