Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1993No. 1288 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Marie Shultz, the claimant and widow of John Shultz, is appealing an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed a referee’s decision granting the petition of the employer, LeRoy Roofing Co., for termination of benefits after determining that the claimant had engaged in a meretricious relationship subject to § 307(7) of the Pennsylva*36nia Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 562 (the Act). We affirm.

The referee found the following facts. The claimant has been receiving death benefits in the amount of $94.00 a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. ScheinertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Nevius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Silo v. RidgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Anthony v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. S.H. Steinman v. T.C. Blocker, Comm'r. of the PSP, of the Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API