Legal Opinion

Hager v. Pacific Mut. Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 28, 1942No. 8PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

This is an action to reinstate and recover the disability benefits on three insurance policies issued to the plaintiff by the immediate predecessor of the defendant.

The defendant is .the successor to the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California through reorganization proceedings (Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life, 10 Cal.2d 307, 74 P.2d 761); Neblett v. Carpenter, 305 U.S. 297, 59 S.Ct. 170, 83 L.Ed. 182. The defendant will be referred to as the New Company and its predecessor as the Old Company.

The Old Company issued to the plaintiff the following three…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Neblett v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Bevins v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Ramsey's v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Everett v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Ward v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API