Legal Opinion

Goebel v. Salt Lake City Southern Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2004No. 20020825PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 Plaintiffs-appellants Edward and Kathy Goebel (the Goebels) appeal a grant of directed verdict and other rulings in favor of defendant-appellee Salt Lake City Southern Railroad Company, Inc. (Southern), and a grant of summary judgment in favor of Salt Lake City Corporation (the City). In brief, the Goebels argue that the trial court committed reversible error by:(1) ruling that, as a matter of law, a certain roadway obstacle could not have been a proximate cause of Mr. Goebel's injuries;(2) ruling that the Goebels were required to give Southern actual or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Martin v. HadixSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Miller v. WeaverUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. GeoMetWatch v. BehuninCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  3. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. S.B.D. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Gregory & Swapp, PLLC v. KranendonkUtah Supreme Court · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API