Legal Opinion

Spector v. Traster

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

According to the findings of fact in this suit for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate, the plaintiff and defendant agreed in writing that the defendant was to purchase a tract of land in Dorchester shown as lot nine on a recorded plan. The agreement recited “It is understood and agreed that there is a common driveway in the rear of said premises.” In 1903, one Davidson acquired title to lots nine and ten on the recorded plan subject to restrictions which are no longer in force. In 1904 Davidson conveyed to Francis M. Wilson, husband of Bertha M. Wilson, lot ten and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Nickerson v. BridgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Forman v. GadouasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Clare v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Harlow v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mackintosh v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Economy Grocery Stores Corp. v. McMenamyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Willett v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Olszewski v. SardynskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API