State v. Sigg
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clayton District Court. — Hon. W. A. Hoyt, Judge. Indictment for rape. There was a verdict and judgment for the state, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
I. The indictment charges the defendant with having committed a rape on the person of one Fredericks Putzin, on or about the twenty-fifth day of May, 1891. The conviction was for an assault with intent to commit a rape. It is urged that the testimony is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. .The evidence of the prosecuting witness shows substantially the following facts: That in May, 1891, she resided in Garnavillo, Clayton county, Iowa, and worked in the family of William Kregel; that on the twenty-fourth day of May, 1891, she came with her brother from her sister’s, at Elkport, and was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. TweedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- State v. PerigoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- State v. GrbaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- State v. HetlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- State v. ShaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- State v. Quan SueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.