Legal Opinion

State v. Waldner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] William Waldner appeals his sentences, contending that the State violated the terms of his plea agreement. Because the prosecutor breached a material term of the plea agreement, we vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing before a different judge.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On February 20, 2004, Waldner pleaded guilty to a series of charges stemming from burglaries he committed in Clark, Codington, Hamlin and Kingsbury Counties. As part of that transaction, Waldner entered into a written plea agreement with the Clark County State’s Attorney in which Waldner agreed to plead…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Ray Lawrence MondragonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Raul Franco-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Andrew James LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Vanden Hoek v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Erickson v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Baldridge v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API