State v. Waldner
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] William Waldner appeals his sentences, contending that the State violated the terms of his plea agreement. Because the prosecutor breached a material term of the plea agreement, we vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing before a different judge.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On February 20, 2004, Waldner pleaded guilty to a series of charges stemming from burglaries he committed in Clark, Codington, Hamlin and Kingsbury Counties. As part of that transaction, Waldner entered into a written plea agreement with the Clark County State’s Attorney in which Waldner agreed to plead…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Ray Lawrence MondragonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Raul Franco-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Andrew James LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Vanden Hoek v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Erickson v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Baldridge v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.