Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Weber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2008No. 24624PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] On October 28, 2004, Jason Erickson (Erickson) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the South Dakota Fifth Judicial Circuit alleging that the State failed to disclose evidence relevant to his sentencing. Erickson filed a supplemental petition on December 19, 2005. The habe-as court heard the matter on May 26, 2006. Thereafter, the court denied Erickson’s petition, filing its letter opinion on December 22, 2006, with findings of fact and conclusions of law entered on July 27, 2007. We affirm.

*741FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Erickson’s appeal from the habe-as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Steichen v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Guthmiller v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Piper v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. GuziakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Legrand v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API