Ducjai v. Dennis
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, President Judge:
In this appeal, we address the question which Juleann Ducjai (hereinafter “appellant”) has presented for our review1, to wit, whether the exclusivity provision contained in *368§ 72 of the Worker’s Compensation Act (hereinafter “WCA”), 77 P.S. § 1, et seq., is without force and effect in law since enactment of § 1719(a) of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (hereinafter “MVFRL”), 75 Pa.C.S.A § 1701 et seq. In other words, did the legislature intend to repeal § 72 sub silencio in all motor vehicle cases? Following an exhaustive review of the record, and the law…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ducaji v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois v. Joseph N. DibartoloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Gardner v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Albright v. FaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Schroeder v. SchraderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.