Legal Opinion

220 Partnership v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1994PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The 220 Partnership (the partnership) filed a civil action by complaint in which it alleged that Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) and its agent, Gregory Golazeski, Esquire, had interfered maliciously with certain rental contracts with tenants of the partnership. To the plaintiffs complaint the defendants filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. The defendants alleged therein that in separate proceedings, held in bankruptcy court, it had been determined factually that the partnership’s interest in the rental property had been divested by judicial sale prior…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Martin v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. V.B. v. J.E.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Kane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Stilp v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Boyd v. Rockwood Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API