Legal Opinion

Corrigan v. Ritter

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by John Corrigan against Margaret Ritter. Defendant moves for leave to serve a supplemental answer.

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This action was commenced October 18,1888, to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff on account of an alleged breach by the defendant of a contract whereby she was to construct two marine boilers, and put them on board of the steamer Aurora, a propeller navigating the Great Lakes, and ••also for damages sustained by the plaintiff caused by the detention of the steamer in consequence of the boilers not being put in as provided by the .contract. About December 8, 1888, the defendant served her answer, deny*164ingthe complaint, and setting up a counter-claim for $1,700, alleged to be the balance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard v. . JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Bostwick v. MenckNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1871
  3. Bull v. RothschildNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Continental Construction & Improvement Co. v. VinalNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. CohenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API