Legal Opinion

Continental Construction & Improvement Co. v. Vinal

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action for malicious prosecution, brought by the Continental Construction & Improvement Company against Quincy A. Vinal. From an order granting leave to file a supplemental complaint, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. In respect to the termination of the case alleged to have been maliciously prosecuted, the original complaint averred that it was brought in the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of New York, in March, 1886; and that after the proofs of Quincy A. Vinal, the plaintiff therein, had been heard, “the said circuit court, upon said proofs, directed the jury to render a verdict for the defendant, and the jury rendered a verdict according to said direction, which said verdict still stands. ” The answer to the original complaint…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reader v. FarrissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Halsted v. HalstedNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  3. Banigan v. Village of NyackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Corrigan v. RitterNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Smith v. BachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API