Bull v. Rothschild
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Richard H. Bull against Maier Rothschild for rent. A motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint was denied, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Brunt, 1\ J.
This action was brought upon a lease whereby the defendant hired of the plaintiff, for the period from the 6th of April, 1887, to the 1st of February, 1888, certain premises in the city of New York, at the yearly rental of $4,500, payable monthly on the 1st of each month. The complaint alleged that the defendant had not paid the rent of said premises which fell due on the 1st of October, 1887, and the 1st of November, 1887, and demanded judgment for the amount so due. Subsequent to the commencement of this action other defaults were made in the payment of rent, and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cummings v. HausenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barker v. PrizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Swedish American Nat'l Bank v. Dickinson Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Campbell v. Poland Spring Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Cassidy v. Saline County BankCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907
- Halsted v. HalstedNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.