Legal Opinion

Golden Rule Insurance v. Montgomery

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 5, 2006No. CV-04-0204-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TEILBORG, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the Plaintiff/Counterdefendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (doc. 73). The Court now rules on the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 23, 2002, the Defendants/Counterclaimants (the “Defendants”) applied for insurance with Plaintiff/Coun-terdefendant Golden Rule Insurance Company (the “Plaintiff’). The application form included a medical history section and required an authorization releasing the Defendants’ medical records to the Plaintiff.

In February of 2002, the Plaintiff issued the Defendants an insurance policy (the “Policy”). The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Berneking v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  3. Columbus Life Insurance Company v. Wilmington Trust NADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Homesite Insurance Company v. JiangDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Michael Wade Simmons v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API