Legal Opinion

Ridings v. Ridings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1982No. 8121DC296PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Rule 56 does not require the movant to set forth the grounds upon which he bases a motion for summary judgment, Conover v. Newton, 297 N.C. 506, 256 S.E. 2d 216 (1979), and, of course, the very nature of the motion obviates the necessity for findings of fact. We assume that the trial judge determined defendant’s evidence of ratification sufficient to meet her burden of persuasion on the affirmative defense, negating the existence of any genuine issue of material fact on the allegations of incompetency and undue influence. These grounds, which we find sufficient, are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Saint Joseph of the Pines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Miller v. TaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Harter v. VernonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Thomas v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Matthews v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API