Legal Opinion

Dowd v. Iantosca

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 16, 1989No. 87-1060PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

While the plaintiff Dowd was still negotiating with the sellers for the purchase of their house, which was listed exclusively with the defendant Iantosca’s real estate agency, Iantosca inspected the premises and decided to buy the property for himself. He designed an offer to purchase that gave the appearance of being better than Dowd’s and presented it to the sellers, through his employee, a licensed salesperson who had been working with Dowd and the sellers. The sellers accepted the offer, and Iantosca purchased the property for the same amount offered by Dowd. The trial judge found and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Comey v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Spence v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Owen v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Chemawa Country Golf, Inc. v. WnukMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jerlyn Yacht Sales, Inc., and Oklahoma Offset, Inc. v. Wayne R. Roman Yacht BrokerageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Ravosa v. ZaisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Refuse & Environmental Systems, Inc. v. Industrial Services Of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Refuse & Environmental Systems, Inc. v. Industrial Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Juncker Associates & Co. v. EnesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API