Albert M. Greenfield & Co. v. Roberts

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

The printed record brought up before us on appeal is incomplete, and reference to the original record has not helped us much. The repeated inclusion of the same deposition leaves it in a confused state. This much does appear from the record :

On November 18, 1936 an amicable action in assumpsit was entered in the court below, between Albert M. Greenfield & Co., as plaintiff, and Hugh Roberts, as defendant, for the recovery of $732.85, which the plaintiff averred was due by the defendant under the terms of a written lease for certain premises, to wit, No. 507 Market…