Legal Opinion

Fogel Refrigerator Co. v. Oteri

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1959No. Appeal, No. 343PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bok,

The question is whether a second petition to open a judgment entered by confession can be considered after a first has been denied and the denial affirmed on appeal.

The dispute arises from an agreement to install refrigerating equipment, with a judgment note given as collateral for the sale of the material by bailment lease. The lease, providing for first payment on November 30, 1955, was dated June 29, 1955, and judgment was taken on July 1, 1955, pursuant to authority in the lease that this might be done before delivery or default. The equipment was not completely…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stradley v. Bath Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Markofski v. YanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Fogel Refrigerator Co. v. OteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Johnson v. NippertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Exler v. Wickes Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Van SlykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Albright v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Laird v. Clearfield & Mahoning Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Chamberlin of Pittsburgh, Inc. v. Fort Pitt Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API