Thompson v. Myrick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, in an action for the specific performance of a contract to convey lands. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*207 By the Court.
Berry, J.
The conclusions of fact found by the court below, so far as they appear to be important upon this appeal, are as follows, viz.: That on or about the 6th day of September, 1858, and prior to that time, the defendant Nathan Myrick was attorney in fact, (duly constituted,) of Francis Longie and Joseph Longie his son, then a minor under the age of fourteen years, and of Francis Roi and Henry Roi his son, then a minor under the age of fourteen years, and was duly authorized to locate certain half-breed scrip issued to said Joseph and Henry in accordance with the provisions…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gilbert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Daily ex rel. Daily v. MinnickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- State Bank v. StrandbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Myrick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Day v. DevittNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.