Day v. Devitt
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Heard on bill, amended bill, supplemental bill, answers and cross-bill, replications and proofs in open court.
1Opinion of the Court
Garrison, V. C.
The original bill in this suit was filed to compel the specific -performance by Martin B. Devitt and wife of a contract made between the said Martin B. Devitt and wife and the complainant, Michael C. Day, which contract was dated the 24th day of December, 19Q6, and related to a piece of-real estate in Jersey City.
Upon the final hearing upon the original bill and the answer and cross-bill of Devitt and wife thereto such facts were developed as caused the complainant to move for and obtain leave to amend his bill, and subsequently to obtain leave to file a supplemental bill…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ruggles v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- United States Mortgage Co. v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Otto v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Richards v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Mayall v. MayallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Krueger v. FrederickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1917
- Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Webster-Art Strength B. L. Assn. v. ArmondoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Mosher v. Van BuskirkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Frobisher v. Tudor Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.