Legal Opinion
Cole v. Asarco Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 2, 2009No. 03-CV-327-GKF-PJCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Doe. No. 177) and defendants’ Motion to Strike Newly Asserted Bases for Class Certification (Doc. No. 286). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is denied and defendants’ Motion to Strike is denied as moot.
I. Background and Procedural History
This action arises from pollution caused by mining in the 40-square mile Tar Creek area, located in Ottawa County in Northeast Oklahoma. In the period from 1891 until about 1970,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lafalier v. LEAD-IMPACTED COMMUNITIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Bell v. 3M Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- McCormick v. Halliburton Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- Lafalier v. LEAD-IMPACTED COMMUNITIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010