Legal Opinion

Pinnell v. Belleque

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 26, 2009No. 06-CV-828-BRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Respondent Brian Belleque’s Motion (# 108) for Partial Summary Judgment on exhaustion/procedural default grounds and Petitioner Mark Allen Pinnell’s Motion (# 120) for Evidentiary Hearing on the adequacy of state-court process and the existence of state-created impediments.

In its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, the State seeks to preclude analysis on the merits of one or more of the claims set forth in Petitioner’s First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on the basis that such claims are unexhausted…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API