Legal Opinion
Lefkowitz v. Esposito
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1979Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bentley Kassal, J.
Defendant moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) to *591dismiss the instant complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
FACTS
Plaintiff Attorney-General commenced this action to declare that defendant Esposito has forfeited his party office of county leader of the Democratic Party in Kings County because of his alleged violations of the law regulating business transactions between political party leaders and companies engaged in pari-mutuel racing activities, under subdivision 2 of section 107 of the Pari-Mutuel Revenue Law (L 1940, ch 254, as amd…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Shea v. EsmayNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Voerg Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. MeltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.