Shea v. Esmay
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtT. Paul Kane, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss amended complaints in the above actions upon the grounds that they do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd. fa], par. 7). Similar motions were previously before this court and an opinion was rendered wherein the factual background was set forth (48 Misc 2d 45). In that decision it was, among other things, held that while an unemancipated child has a cause of action against his parent for assault and battery, a complaint that negates the element of intent does not state a cause of action for assault and battery.
The amended…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Henderson v. HendersonNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Shea v. EsmayNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Decker v. DeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lefft v. Canada Life Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Sarlat v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
- Shea v. EsmayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Untermeyer v. Myriad Investors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- First National City Bank v. MayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.