Legal Opinion

Small v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 12, 1967No. [No. 237, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

Appellants own about 14 acres to the west of the line AB on the sketch made a part of this opinion. The hatched area ABC is the part of their land being condemned by the appellee (the State) for the extension (in Montgomery County) of Connecticut Avenue from University Boulevard north to Viers Mill Road. In addition to the hatched area (0.79 acres, in fee simple) and 0.79 acres in easements, the State is also acquiring denial of vehicular access along the line AB which, of course, will deprive appellants’ property of direct access to Connecticut Avenue. The parties stipulated that the fair…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Perellis v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Slear v. JankiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. McCawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. D'Arago v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gardner v. City Of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Gardner v. City of Baltimore MayorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Mauck v. WALTER BAILEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF LESTERCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Mayor of New Market v. ArmstrongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API