Legal Opinion

Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1992No. 91-1817PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

This case involves another local land-use dispute that has landed in federal court through 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The issue presented by this litigation is strikingly familiar: appellants claim that they were denied substantive due process by the failure of various Baltimore city officials to approve proposals for residential development of particular property. We reject this claim. Because Baltimore’s land-use regulations granted discretion to city officials with regard to approval of the proposed development, appellants possessed no property interest protected by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Creative Environments, Inc. v. Robert EstabrookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pulte Home Corporation v. Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Gardner v. City Of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Siena Corporation v. Mayor and City Council of RockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. Shooting Point, L.L.C. v. CummingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  5. SAS Associates 1, LLC v. City Council for the City of Chesapeake, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API