Legal Opinion

In Re Roberto D.B.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 16, 2007No. 110, Sept. Term, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

923 A.2d 115 (2007)

399 Md. 267

In re ROBERTO d.B.

No. 110, Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 16, 2007.

Dorrance D. Dickens (Deborah Y. Luxenberg, Luxenberg, Johnson & Dickens, P.C., Washington, DC, on brief), for appellant.

No argument on behalf of appellee.

Argued before BELL, C. J., ELDRIDGE,[*] RAKER, WILNER,[*] CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, JJ.

BELL, C.J.

This case compels the Court to consider the ever-continuing development of artificial reproductive technologies. In the last two decades, methods of producing a child have advanced beyond the traditional realm. In a traditional…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Johnson v. CalvertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Rand v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API