Legal Opinion

Vezina v. Souliere

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The plaintiff sues for damages for fraud in the sale to him by the defendant of a certain horse. The declaration contains two counts. Each count alleges in substance that for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to purchase said horse the defendant wilfully, falsely, and fraudulently represented said horse to be a good horse for farm work, of kind disposition, and safe and gentle in every way; that in truth and in fact said horse was a kicker, “had a vicious propensity to kick without warning or provocation,” all of which the defendant then and there well knew, or ought to have known; and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Surely Co. v. WangardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Razey v. J. B. Colt Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Bruce v. Fiss, Doerr & Carroll Horse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway & Light Co. v. Sprague Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Pinney v. AndrusSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Nelson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Jurcich v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Landriani v. Lake Mohawk Country ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API