Legal Opinion

Hopp & Flesch, LLC v. Backstreet

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 19, 2005No. 04SC697PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENDER, Justice.

I. Introduction

We review the court of appeals’ decision in Backstreet v. Hopp & Flesch L.L.C., 107 P.3d 1022 (Colo.App.2004), which held that a sheriffs department advisement to its employee, Raquel Backstreet, that any statements she made during an internal civil investigation could not be used against her in subsequent criminal proceedings, constituted a grant of use immunity under the apparent authority doctrine.1 Id. at 1026. The court of appeals overturned the trial court’s ruling on summary judgment. The trial court held it was not malpractice, as a matter of law, for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Henisse v. First Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Legro v. RobinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Henisse v. First Transit, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Lehouillier v. GallegosSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API