Legal Opinion

Kelenic v. Berndt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

It appears without dispute that under the rules of the industrial commission a building that accommodates more than four families must be illuminated from one hour after sunset to one hour before sunrise, in the public passageways and stairways, and that there shall be a light at the head and foot of every stairway. The trial court correctly held that the duty thus imposed upon *242the defendant landlord was a statutory one, to which assumption of risk was not a defense, and that under the doctrine of Beck v. Siemers, 174 Wis. 437, 183 N. W. 157, the use by the deceased of the unlighted stairway…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Besnys v. Herman Zohrlaut Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fandek v. Barnett & Record Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Beck v. SiemersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kielar v. Fred Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Wilson v. Evangelical Lutheran Church of the ReformationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Holcomb v. SzymczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Washburn v. SkoggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API