Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Halsted Communications, Ltd.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 26, 2009No. 07-cv-30164-MAPPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. Nos. 113 & 116)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The cross motions for partial summary judgment filed by the parties place the court in a labyrinth that would have baffled the resourcefulness of Tom Sawyer in McDougal’s cave.
Plaintiffs are technicians employed by Defendant Halsted Communications, Ltd. (“Halsted, Ltd.”). Defendants are Halsted Ltd.; Halsted Communications, LLC; and Kirk Halsted. The heart of the issue is whether, for a certain period of time, Defendants were obliged to pay Plaintiffs time and a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adria International Group, Inc. v. Ferré Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Reich v. Newspapers of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ahle v. Veracity Research Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Cerutti v. FRITO LAY, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Avery v. Chariots for HireDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Troy v. Kehe Food Distributors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- Fox v. Commonwealth Worldwide Chauffeured Transportation of NY, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.