Legal Opinion

Magness v. Equitable Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 1939No. [No. 14, April Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The appellant, a depositor in the banking department of the trust company, made a practice of issuing checks on the company when he had no sufficient funds on deposit to pay them and then making subsequent deposits to cover them; and as some of the covering deposits were not made in time for crediting on the books of the company, according to its customary methods, before the checks drawn were presented, they were returned for lack of funds. The depositor sued for damages in an action of tort, but a verdict for the defendant was directed, and from the resulting judgment the depositor appeals.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Cohen v. First National Bank of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Chesapeake Bank v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  4. Canal Bank & Trust Co. v. DennySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Siegman v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. University National Bank v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Suburban Trust Co. v. WallerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Taylor v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API