Bailey v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
COOLAHAN, Senior District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on motion of the plaintiffs (trustees for the children of Robert L. and Patricia Vesco) and by Patricia Vesco, one of the cross-claim defendants (Robert L. Vesco is the other cross-claim defendant) to stay the action in the United States District Court until the United States Tax Court may first redetermine the tax liability of cross-claim defendants, 1 or in the alternative, that the Government’s counter- and cross-claims for determination of the amount of taxes due and for foreclosure be stricken. 2
Plaintiffs originally filed…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robbins Flooring, Inc. v. Federal Floors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Morris v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1986
- United States v. Katherine G. D. Bourbon Formige, Beatrice M. Scott-Hansen, (Intervenor-Defendant)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Vesco v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- United States v. BallentineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981