Legal Opinion

Foy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 19, 1989No. 106, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN H. SMITH, Judge,

Specially Assigned.

We shall here hold that a trial judge erred when he entered summary judgment in favor of all defendants as to all counts of a complaint based on the fact that the subject matter was preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Plaintiff had included a well-pleaded count in her complaint based specifically on ERISA. In the view we take of this case in the light of the way it reaches us procedurally we do not reach the interesting question of how the ERISA plan in question should be construed.

David Brian Fox, son of Mrs.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Liscombe v. Potomac Edison Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Metropolitan Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. BasilikoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Goodwich v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API