Reynolds Metals Co. v. Couch

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

Prior to January 11, 1982, appellees, Couch, Bates and Dickey, who were employed by appellant, Reynolds Metal Company, had been informed that they were among a group of employees who would be affected by a reduction in force. Pursuant to a union contract with Reynolds these appellees had the option of “bumping” less senior employees but chose not to exercise that option and, therefore, ceased work on the above date.

On June 29, 1982, the Arkansas Board of Review affirmed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal holding that appellees were entitled to unemployment benefits.…