Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank v. Wolf

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. File No. 4994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

Action for money had- and received. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant AVolf appeals.

*164.On the 15th day of November, 1919, the defendants each executed and delivered to the plaintiff bank a promissory note in the sum of $2,200, payable on the 31st day of December, 1919, and each received credit for that amount of money at the bank. The notes were not paid at maturity, and the plaintiff, disregarding said notes, brought this action against the defendants jointly for the recovery of the whole amount. Defendant Barton defaulted, but Wolf answered, claiming that:

“Each of the said notes…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cullen v. SpottsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API