Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Norton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1998No. 205-96PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOB DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Applicant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was entitled to discharge pursuant to Tex.Code Crim. Proe. Ann. art. 32.01 because he was indicted outside “the next term of court” as set out in art. 32.01. The trial judge denied relief and applicant appealed. The court of appeals reversed the trial court’s denial of habeas relief. Norton v. State, 918 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.App. — Hous. [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted review to determine the correctness of that decision.

However, after carefully considering the two question…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Easley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Cameron v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  5. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API