Legal Opinion

Noble Drilling Co. v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1928No. 18882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, V. C. J.

This is an action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as follows: Y. V. Murphy as claimant; Noble Drilling Company as employer and petitioner; Commercial Casualty Company as insurance carrier- and petitioner, and State Industrial Commission as respondent.

On May 10, 1926, V. V. Murphy, while employed by the Noble Drilling Company, was injured by the negligent act of a third party and it was necessary to amputate the little toe of his right foot, and on June 17th he filed a claim with the State industrial Commission'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  2. Watson v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Register v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Freeland v. DolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Craig v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beck v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. McAlester Corporation v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Bolinger v. KiburzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. American Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co. v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. Ott v. St. Paul Union StockyardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API