Legal Opinion

People of Village of Cahokia v. Wright

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1974No. 45940PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

The defendants in these consolidated cases, Carl Wright and Joan Morris, were charged with violating a recent amendment to the zoning ordinance of the Village of Cahokia. The circuit court of St. Clair County dismissed the charges, ruling that the amendment was unconstitutional. The appellate court reversed (11 Ill. App. 3d 124), and this court allowed the defendants’ petition for leave to appeal.

The challenged amendment to the zoning ordinance reads as follows:

“5. Except as provided in the following, no person shall be permitted to park or occupy any trailer on any premises in any district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Napierkowski v. Township of GloucesterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Reitman v. Village of River ForestIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wright v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  4. City of Champaign v. RosemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Oak Forest Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. City of Oak ForestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Gurba v. Community High School District No. 155Illinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Town of Stonewood v. BellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API