Legal Opinion

Norton v. Jensen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1892PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the District of Oregon. Bill by Edwin Norton and Oliver W. Norton against Mathias Jensen and John Fox for infringement of a patent. Decree for complainants. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Hawley, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity for the infringement of certain letters patent. The circuit court entered a decree adjudging that the defendants have infringed claims 1 and 2 of letters patent No. 267,014, dated November 7, 1882, granted to Edwin Norton, for a “ machine for putting on the ends of fruit and other cans; ” claims 6 and 7 of letters patent No. 274,368, dated March 20, 1883, granted to Edwin Norton and John G. Hodgson, for a “can-ending machine;” claim 14 of letters patent No. 294,065, dated February 26, 1884, granted to E. Norton and J. Cf. Hodgson, for a “…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Wicke v. OstrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Winans v. New York & H. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Kalten-BachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Adam v. FolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  3. Hanifen v. E. H. Godshalk Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  4. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. United States v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API