Legal Opinion

Tinkham v. Groveport-Madison Local School District

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1991No. 90AP-77PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Amy Potenza and her mother Carol Ann Tinkham, appeal the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas’ grant of a directed verdict for defendant United Transportation, Inc., d.b.a. Yellow Cab Company (“UTI”), and of a partial directed verdict for defendant Groveport-Madison Local School District (“Groveport”). Defendant Uriel Hundley cross-appeals from the verdict in the amount of $425,000 in favor of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs raise the following six assignments of error:

“1. The trial court erred when it granted defendant United Transportation’s motion for a directed verdict…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Auto Mutual Ins. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gayheart v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State v. MathisOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Teixeira v. Cab Three, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Connell v. Call-A-Cab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API