Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Connell v. Call-A-Cab, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 2006No. 1031731Published

1ConcurrenceLyons, Justice

The main opinion correctly concludes that summary judgment in favor of CallA-Cab, Inc., d/b/a AAA Cab Company (“AAA”) on the' issue of its liability for an alleged sexual assault by Anthony Hamlin, a driver of one of its taxicabs, perpetrated *76against Kristi Connell, one of his passengers, is due to be reversed.

Connell points out that under § 37-3-19(a), Ala.Code 1975, “[i]t shall be the duty of every common carrier of passengers by motor vehicle to establish and provide safe and adequate service....” AAA does not dispute the applicability here of this Code section. The main opinion deems it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mobile Cab & Baggage Co. v. BusbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Tinkham v. Groveport-Madison Local School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API