Legal Opinion
Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided October 19, 1978No. C78-029KPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KERR, District Judge.
This is a Title VII action instituted under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2, 2000e-3. The material facts are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows:
Plaintiff Abraisto Vincent Romero, a Mexican-American, became an employee of Union Pacific Railroad Company on October 9, 1975 as a laborer in the Laramie panel yards, Laramie, Wyoming. Upon entry into the service of the Railroad, plaintiff agreed in writing to obey all of the rules and regulations of Union Pacific Railroad Company, including the terms and conditions of the Collective…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dr. Joy HOCHSTADT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- John L. Broadway v. City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schaulis v. CTB/McGraw-Hill, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
- Croushorn v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Tenn.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983