Hoyt v. Carey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, C. J.
Raymond T. Hoyt et. al., copartners, contracted with Major county, Okla., by and through its duly constituted board of county commissioners, for the performance of excavating work on a road project for the county. A portion of the excavating was classified as “A” (that is, dirt and other easily moved materials) to be done at a relatively low cost. It is alleged that the county engineer represented to plaintiffs that he had sounded the hill where the excavating was to be done and assured them that the material to be moved all fell within the definition of class “A,” and that their bid was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. SeawellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Oklahoma City v. Green Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Butler v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Davis v. City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mahr v. Board of County Com'rs of Pottawatomie CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Douglass v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954