Legal Opinion

In re George C.

New York Family Court

Decided October 6, 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMargaret Taylor, J.

In petitions filed by their attendance teachers, respondents George C., Jose C., Joey M. and Luis L. were each alleged to be persons in need of supervision as a consequence of their alleged habitual truancy.

In hearings before this court, the only evidence offered to prove respondents’ truancy was the testimony of attendance teachers and transcripts prepared by the attendance teachers from school records purporting to document the attendance record of each respondent. Although available, none of the persons actually involved in recording the daily attendance of the respondents was produced by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of L.Z.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
  3. In re Jodel KK.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re Keith H.New York City Family Court · 1990
  5. In re Kelly V.New York City Family Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API