Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1990No. 88-1666PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

We have reviewed Powell’s seven propositions of law, independently balanced the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and evaluated the proportionality of the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.

In his second proposition of law, Powell contends that the trial court should have appointed a psychiatrist to “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.” Ake v. Oklahoma (1985), 470 U.S. 68, 83.

Ake held “that when a defendant demonstrates to the trial judge that his sanity at the time of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API