State v. Powell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
We have reviewed Powell’s seven propositions of law, independently balanced the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and evaluated the proportionality of the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.
In his second proposition of law, Powell contends that the trial court should have appointed a psychiatrist to “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.” Ake v. Oklahoma (1985), 470 U.S. 68, 83.
Ake held “that when a defendant demonstrates to the trial judge that his sanity at the time of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.